The Medicaid stuff is getting significantly harder to negotiate, what with recent federal budget cuts that are tightening the rules on what gets paid by whom and when. I've been researching this lately in an effort to "break the logjam" that's been occurring lately in cases that cannot be finalized in a timely manner because there are astronomical bills for which Medicaid coverage is being denied or having to be refiled again and again. Here's some of what I'm finding...
At the website of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, see Third Party Liability, which underscores the "alternative source of payment" argument doctors and hospitals frequently use to argue that the adoptive parents/adoption agency should be charged all medical costs related to the birth of a baby who is placed for adoption. See also Mandatory Eligibility Groups, where it specifies that an infant born to a Medicaid-eligible mom only remains eligible for coverage under her policy "throughout the first year of life so long as the infant remains in the mother's household." (Since relinquishment terminates her legal relationship with her baby, it stands to reason that any Medicaid coverage for that child ends at that point, as well, which is why adopting parents must be prepared to cover the medical bills incurred on behalf of their baby, whether or not their insurance provides coverage from birth or from placement.)
Adoption agencies have no way of predicting (1) how much hospital bills may run, nor (2) what insurance will or will not cover, nor (3) how long it may take for Medicaid/insurance claims to be processed after the discharge/placement has been done. But as Angela was saying yesterday, this makes it that more crucial that all adopting families be fully aware of the potential bills they might face should insurance deny coverage after the fact. We do try to emphasize in orientation that there are no guarantees, and that's why our estimates include all anticipated medical costs (regardless of the birthparents' Medicaid status). But it's up to each family to know their limits and to have a Plan B, if faced with catastrophic expenses for which there is no coverage (just as they would if they had birthed a biological child for whom the bills exceeded available coverage.)
Elizabeth,
Is it possible to take a short-term plan that only covers the baby from birth to the 'legal adoption'? Our plan states that the child is only covered once they are 'legally adopted'. However, they also say that if it is in the court order that they must cover the child from the date of birth then they will also consider that fact. We want to cover our bases of course and not be left un-insured for the baby's inpatient stay.
Thanks a lot for your insight! Nichole