Jump to content

John&Nina

Members
  • Posts

    1,420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by John&Nina

  1. I just stumbled on this thread, thanks to Jan. We would have seriously considered bringing these little ones into our home if we had had our paperwork in order. Several family issues unfortunately have slowed us down.

    It's funny, though. When we started the process I told Nina one stipulation I had was that Hendrick remained the "oldest" in our family. However, as we all know, man plans and God laughs.

    With Abrazo on the case, an excellent home for this boy and girl is not far away. Our prayers to all in this soon-to-be triad. May God's blessings flow freely for everyone involved.

  2. I received this press release by e-mail today:

    The cost of having a baby, from the first prenatal visit to the baby’s delivery, averaged roughly $7,600 for an uncomplicated birth, according to the latest News and Numbers from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The total, in 2004 dollars, includes payments for hospital childbirth, prenatal office visits, prescription medicines, and other services.

    AHRQ also found that:

    • Average spending for prenatal care for women with private insurance and women with Medicaid was about the same—approximately $2,000. However, their inpatient delivery costs differed: $6,520 for the former and $4,577 average for the latter.

    • On average, privately insured women paid about 8 percent of their total expenses for pregnancy out of pocket, or about $660 for a privately insured woman with an average level of expenses. In contrast, women on Medicaid paid only about 1 percent out of pocket.

    • Only 23 percent of women had some prescription drug expenses associated with their pregnancy and the median amount of these expenses was $640. About three-quarters of all prescription drug expenses during pregnancy were for nutritional products such as prenatal vitamins.

    AHRQ, which is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, works to enhance the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care in the United States. The data in this AHRQ News and Numbers summary are taken from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a highly detailed source of information on the health services used by Americans, the frequency with which they are used, the cost of those services, and how they are paid.

    Abrazo's cost estimate for child birth is obviously very much in line with the results of this study.

    Here is a link to the study.

  3. This may not be the right place for this, because it's about a celebrity who placed a child for adoption, but here's a recent quote from Joni Mitchell about the effect that placing her daughter had on her and her music. Mitchell has since been reunited with her daughter.

    "I was a painter first, but I got waylaid by the music — first as a hobby to make my smokes at art school," said Mitchell, speaking in a slightly husky voice as she chain-smoked American Spirit cigarettes, a habit she developed at age 9 after nearly dying from polio.

    "At the time, I just sang folk songs but then a tragedy occurred in my life. I had a daughter and I gave her up and that puts a big hole in a woman that's hard to explain. I was destitute ... and three years later I had a career and money," said Mitchell, whose first album, "Song to a Seagull," came out in 1968. "But I didn't like fame. ... I understood the price of it at an early age."

  4. Did Stamos remarry after Rebecca Romijn (sp) or is he considering being a single parent? --anyone know?, merely curious.

    -A

    Sorry, Adam. I only posted the first two paragraphs of that story. Here's the rest...

    Stamos and Rebecca Romijn divorced in 2005, nearly a year after they announced they were separating after five years of marriage. Romijn, 34, married Jerry O'Connell in July.

    "Right after I got divorced or separated, I was like, 'I've got to find somebody,"' Stamos says. "Then I went through a phase where I hated dating. Now I'm kind of embracing it."

    Stamos, who co-stars on the NBC medical drama "ER," says he doesn't find dating hard now.

    "I think I'm probably easier to date," he says. "I'm certainly not as wild as I used to be."

    Of his marriage to Romijn, Stamos says: "It burned really bright, and I kind of knew it was going to burn out at some point. But it was a great ride and I don't regret one minute of it."

  5. Another celebrity looking at adoption...

    John Stamos says he's ready to be a father, is interested in adoption, in magazine interview

    NEW YORK (AP) — John Stamos played uncle Jesse on the '80s sitcom "Full House." Now he wants to be a father.

    "If I don't have kids soon, I am going to adopt," the 44-year-old actor tells OK! magazine in its latest issue, on newsstands Friday. "Even if I do have kids, I think I will (adopt). I always thought to myself that I would be a better father later on in life."

  6. My brother, Ralph, passed away four years ago this week. He had colon cancer, lived with my parents for the last 10 months of his life and, quite literally, died in my mother's arms.

    I want to share with you the Bible verses that have comforted me from the moment I learned of his passing. They have stayed with me since, and I reread them today to once again remind me of the comfort that awaits those who suffer.

    "After this I looked, and there was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, robed in white, with palm branches in their hands.

    "They cried out in a loud voice, saying, 'Salvation belongs to our God who is seated on the throne, and to the Lamb!' ...

    "Then one of the elders addressed me, saying, 'Who are these, robed in white, and where have they come from?'

    "I said to him, 'Sir, you are the one that knows.' Then he said to me, 'These are they who have come out of the great ordeal; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

    "For this reason they are before the throne of God, and worship him day and night within his temple, and the one who is seated on the throne will shelter them.

    "They will hunger no more, and thirst no more; the sun will not strike them, nor any scorching heat; for the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of the water of life, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes.'"

    - Revelation 7:9-17

    RIP, my brother, Ralph David, June 6, 1954 - Sept. 23, 2003

  7. Would it help if, at some point, you invited your family members (just one or two?) to get on the phone with Nathan's birthmom themselves, to tell her how loved he is to to hear for themselves how sweet she is? Just a thought...

    Good idea, Elizabeth. I remember when our birthmom reached either Nina's or my mother (for some reason right now, I forget which, although I think it was my mom). It was totally unplanned and by accident. We just happened not to be home when she called. Even though the conversation was short, I think it went a long way to lifting the veil of mystery. She became very human at that point and not an abstract. I think that's important.

  8. I really agree with the "no secrets" concept. They eventually come out - and usually at the worst time - lead to feelings of betrayal and unneccessary guilt and shame.

    Although we are not able to have the kind of openness we desire with our daughter's birthmother, it is awesome to see openness work even at the level of our soon-to-be 2 year-old. At least once a week she points to the little red scrapbook on her shelf in her room, saying "baby". She flips through the pages and on most occassions she will point to her birthmother and call her by name. It's not the ideal (being able to look face-to-face and call her by name), but we can always hope for what the future may hold.

    Laurie,

    I agree with you. While we're terrible with photo albums (see Nina's blog on this), I do sit Hendrick on my lap and put on "slide shows" on the computer. When he sees his birthmother, he says her name. Also, every night during prayer time we mention her.

    The cutest thing was one night when I left her out, he stopped me and said her name. Now, it's like a little game with us. At one point in the prayer, I say, "and..." and he'll chime in with his birthmother's name.

    I wish he could hear her voice more often, so there was more of a connection there, but as you said, the future may bring that.

    I honestly could not imagine not sharing his story with him. It's a great story. I hope he'll be as proud of it as we are.

  9. Another celebrity adoption:

    Mary-Louise Parker has adopted a baby girl from Africa, report says

    NEW YORK (AP) — Mary-Louise Parker has adopted a baby girl from Africa, her spokeswoman confirmed to People.com.

    When asked for comment Tuesday, Parker's spokeswoman, Tamar Salup, referred The Associated Press to the Web site.

    Parker, 43, has a 3-year-old son, Will, with ex-boyfriend Billy Crudup.

    The actress stars on Showtime's offbeat comedy "Weeds" as a newly widowed mother of two who starts selling marijuana to maintain her family's comfortable suburban lifestyle.

    Parker co-stars with Brad Pitt and Casey Affleck in "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford," which opens in theaters Friday.

    She won an Emmy Award for "Angels in America." She has won two Golden Globe Awards, one for "Angels in America," the other for "Weeds," and had a recurring role on NBC's "The West Wing."

    Her screen credits also include "Fried Green Tomatoes," "Boys on the Side" and "The Client."

  10. Just when you think all celebrities adoptions have weird circumstances (Madonna, Rosie, etc.), along comes Jamie Lee Curtis, who seems incredibly normal, respectful and insightful. She's not saving the world; she's not trying to make a political statement. She wants to be a mom, and adoption was her route to fulfill that wish. God bless her!

    Her response to contact with the birthmother was indeed vague, but who knows that the reasons are behind that. It would have been nice to hear, "Yes, we have a relationship," but that may not be her reality.

    One very interesting tidbit was her response to acting roles and motherhood. Often, we hear actors talk about being "brave" and accepting roles that are waaaaayyyy out there, either in terms of violence, sex or some other thing that kids really shouldn't be watching. Frankly, I think it's more brave to acknowledge that your life, with children in it, is simply not your own anymore and that your choices really need to reflect that. She seems to believe that, too.

    All in all, a very interesting interview

  11. I truly believe that folks such as Rosie and Paris have been placed on this earth to give us irrefutable evidence that there really are people in the world who are more obnoxious, stupid and annoying than anyone we could possibly come across in our own neighborhoods.

    In other words, count your blessings...

  12. "I hear this [from adopters] all the time: 'We're the real parents...'

    Do you know what adoptive parents really mean by that? What they really mean is, "We're not real parents, and if our child searches for and finds her [his] parents, she [he] will abandon us and we will be what we were before we adopted: childless."

    People who have to assert who they really are don't know who they really are. "

    We are also bombarded with insensitive and downright ignorant or rude remarks that make us need to defend our position. And we are often times called upon to educate those same people so as to spread the "correct" message about adoption. So, while we may very well have an honest respect for the "realness" of the birthparents and are very comfortable with our role as real parents, we feel the need to assert our "realness" when placed on the defensive. I think we don't answer that way unless provoked.

    Dr. Babb's "the lady doth protest too much" approach doesn't fly with me.

    I agree with your sentiments completely. How often do we hear comments about how our children are not our "real" children? Or hear people ask what happened to the "real" parents? I've kind of developed a "water off a duck's back" attitude to those types of comments, but if anything will make you stand up to declare your own "realness," it's being faced with someone who just won't accept what you know to be fact: I wake up at night with my son when he cries. I feed him in the morning. I clean his cuts and scrapes and sing stupid songs with him. Does he think I'm real? You bet.

    None of this, of course, negates the role or impact of birthparents in our children's lives and our lives. In fact, this kind of psychobabble seems designed to drive a wedge among the partners in the adoption triad, rather than help to bond us.

    I swear that people like Dr. Babb put too much weight on what escapes our mouths sometimes in a bizarre effort to prove how smart and insightful they are. Even Freud recognized that sometimes a cigar really is just a cigar...

    (By the way, Elizabeth, I scored a 110 on that little test, and that was only because HP is still too young for homework!)

  13. This is a very interesting debate, but for clarification purposes, we should distinguish between civil rights and human rights. Civil rights are rights bestowed by governments; human rights are rights bestowed by the virtue of birth.

    I think Elizabeth, recognizing the difference, was very careful when she chose the headline for this thread. I just wanted to spell it out further. The original article seems to come down on the side of parenthood not being a human right, but instead being a civil right (and a debatable one, at that).

    There have been numerous worries about "playing God" when it comes to the ethical implications of modern genetics, so there is a valid question here: How far is too far? Frankly, when we start engineering the process of procreation to predetermine sex, that's too far for me. Others may find that perfectly OK.

    When it comes to the children, however, I think we can all agree. It is a human right to know where you come from. It should be a civil right, too.

    One last thing, and it is a purely personal observation not transferable to others. I view parenthood as a privilege. The minute I allow myself to think about it as a "right" is the moment I become more important than the child I am parenting. That, for me, would be very dangerous.

  14. My least favorite thing I have heard to date is "I am concerned about how you will handle having a baby if you are having this much trouble dealing with infertility."

    I've seen some things that make my jaw drop, but this is one of the most insanely stupid comments I've ever heard of.

    When confronted with dunces like this, just walk away. Traci, I'm sorry you ever had to hear anything so mean.

    This person is an idiot.

    I know what made me and my husband accept our "unexplained infertility" (we're a medical mystery to all the doctors) was the realization that everything happens for a reason. Chance/fate/luck brought our children ito our lives through the absolute miracle of adoption and reaffirmed our belief in a higher being.

    Just my thoughts,

    Tamra

    Tamra, we were in the same boat, and feel the exact same way. We've commented on this in talks before religious groups that the "unexplained fertility" and our adoption journey were our challenge, and it was our blessing to accept it.

  15. OK, I'm not a member of a new group, but one of the craziest things said to us was neither insulting nor annoying. It was just plain funny.

    Pre-Hendrick, we were discussing our "issues" with some friends at a party. They had just had a beautiful baby girl.

    "You know what you need to do?" said the woman. "Get really, really drunk."

    Then the couple, dear friends and former coworkers, proceeded to tell us they did just that when their little girl was conceived, even confessing to us, while cackling hysterically, that they got "kinky."

    I'm not sure what that meant, and I really don't want to know. But it gave Nina and I lots of jokes to tell each other on the way home...

  16. I couldn't even read all the comments left behind because they were so base and off-topic. I think your comments were pulled for being too intelligent for such a tasteless conversation.

    You're probably right. TMZ is most likely looking for snark rather than seriousness. And there's nothing like a bit of intelligence to ruin the troglodytes' party!

  17. Wow - I hate when the media does things like pulling freedom of speech off a web-site especially when it isn't anything outside of the truth.

    Good statements, but I could not find them on E.

    Please note that "freedom of speech" applies when it's the government doing the censoring. Privately owned companies are allowed (and, indeed, should be encouraged) to set restrictions on what people can say on their Web sites. Some are very strict; some not so. But all have restrictions.

    While Elizabeth's and Renee's comments don't fall into this category (and I'm making no excuses for what the Web site operators did), one person's truth is another person's libel.

  18. Just went looking for your post, Elizabeth, and I could not find it. Strikes me that what you and Renee had to say was relevant commentary. One question: Did you put your affiliation in the post? If so, they may have considered it advertising. Some sites are very strict about stuff like that.

    Either way, what the two of you said was on the mark. It's a shame more people didn't get a chance to see it.

  19. Meanwhile, USA TODAY reported on Friday that Queen Latifah is preparing to adopt from the New Jersey foster care system, which is great! However, the article ("Latifah: It's the Right Time To Be a Mom") does on to quote Latifah erroneously stating that she understands why people go outside the U.S. (to adopt, since) "you can adopt someone here and the birthparents have three years to come back and get that child."

    What Latifah was probably refering to is New Jersey's byzantine child welfare system, which is notoriously and frustratingly difficult to deal with.

    That being said, it was the reporter's job to challenge such a blatantly incorrect statement. You would be right to send letters to the editor seeking an opportunity to enlighten USA Today's 2 million readers...

  20. (T)he best celebrity clients I've known were the ones who were less impressed with their "station in life" than everyone else, and didn't let themselves become jaded by everyone else wanting some piece of them-- rather, they were magnaminous enough to still have plenty of love and authenticity to share with their new child and his/her birthfamily.

    Elizabeth, I'm so happy to hear this. I've been troubled for a long time about these very public adoption stories of celebrities, and I can't help but feel that the children will suffer because of them. The fact that you know of cases where celebrity adoption has been different and apparently successful is a comfort.

    Well-meaning celebrities have just as much right as we do to go through this process. That some are willing to not cut corners is testament to their integrity. It also makes these public displays all the more questionable. If you can make an adoption plan quietly (although not secretly), without trying to cast yourself in the media (or on Oprah) as some kind of saint, why wouldn't you do it?

    The answer, of course, is that publicity for some of these folks like Madonna is more important than anything else, including the child.

  21. Here's an unfortunate follow-up to the ticket auction:

    Woman says eBay shut down football ticket auction intended to help raise money for adoption

    CANTON, Ohio (AP) -- A woman says eBay has shut down her sale of two tickets to

    Saturday's Michigan-Ohio State football game that she and her husband had hoped

    would help them raise money to adopt a boy from Guatemala.

    Kristie Sigler and her husband, Ken, put their season tickets, about 10 rows

    from the field, on the Internet auction site hoping the payout would help defray

    the $12,500 cost to begin processing their adoption paperwork.

    But Sigler said eBay canceled the sale Wednesday, saying it violated its policy

    on charitable auctions.

    "They never called, never e-mailed us or anything. They took it off and said

    because we were using the auction as fundraiser for the adoption, it violated their

    policy," Kristie Sigler told The Repository newspaper in Thursday's editions.

    According to its Web site, eBay has specific guidelines for charitable

    fundraising because the area is subject to many state and federal laws. A message

    seeking comment from the company was left early Thursday.

    The couple had been offered as much as $1,550 for the tickets by Wednesday

    afternoon.

    "I'm most concerned that people will think we weren't being genuine," Sigler

    said. "We're still selling the tickets."

    The tickets are now listed on the Web site dreamseats.com.

    The top-ranked Buckeyes and second-ranked Wolverines are both undefeated, and

    the winner advances to the national championship game.

  22. "I have to say, Madonna, that's a brave thing that you did,'' Winfrey said. "This audience, I know, applauds you for it.''

    You just had to know that Oprah wouldn't get tough with the Material Girl. As usual, "the media" is to blame for Madonna's troubles. Not her own poor choices, not her questionable dealings in Africa. It's the fault of the media, that same group she so shamelessly seeks out in her endless attempts to sell herself, her books and her albums. I get sick of that line.

    Now she's a "hero" to Oprah and her minions. This whole episode is very disturbing.

×
×
  • Create New...